TK Global OS — Regulatory notesCryptoasset licensing: United Kingdom, Kenya, Brazil

Brazil's 30 October filing date is a banking deadline as much as a licensing one

Brazil Published 2026-08-24

The date, and where it comes from

Brazil's virtual asset framework came into force on 2 February 2026 under article 28 of Resolução BCB nº 519. Instrução Normativa BCB nº 704, published on 29 January 2026 and effective from 2 February 2026, sets out the authorisation procedure. Article 9, caput, of IN BCB 704 fixes 30 October 2026 as the Phase 1 filing deadline for providers that were already operating on 2 February 2026.

As at 24 August 2026 that date is unchanged. There has been no extension and no prorogation. IN BCB 704 stands at version 2.0 with IN BCB 739 as its only amendment, and IN 739 did not touch article 9. That leaves 67 days.

Two routes, and function decides which one you are on

IN BCB 704 runs two tracks. Providers already operating on 2 February 2026 go through two phases, articles 9 and 10. New entrants, and institutions already supervised by the Banco Central, use a single procedure under article 5.

Which category you file for is not a branding decision. Article 4 of Resolução BCB nº 520 sets three: intermediário, custodiante, and corretora, which is intermediation and custody together. The test is what you actually do. A firm that matches orders and also holds client keys is a corretora, whatever its marketing calls it.

What happens to a firm that does not file

This is the part that makes 30 October different from an ordinary filing date. A provider that does not file must cease activity within 30 days, notify its clients, and transfer their virtual assets and funds to other authorised institutions. It is not a case of missing a deadline and applying later in the year.

The commercial consequence arrives through the banking system. From that date, institutions supervised by the Banco Central are prohibited from facilitating virtual asset operations with unauthorised providers. In practice that means the Brazilian banking and payment rails an unauthorised provider depends on stop being available to it. A business can survive losing a licence application for a while; very few survive losing their accounts and their PIX access at the same time. Confirm the precise provision behind that prohibition against the BCB normative text before you rely on it in a board paper, but plan on the effect.

Refusal produces the same cliff

Filing is not by itself protection. If authorisation is refused, withdrawn or the file is archived, the institution has 15 days to evidence either corporate dissolution or a change of corporate object to a non-regulated activity, with a corresponding change of name. If it was operating at that point, the same 30-day cessation applies: stop, notify clients, transfer assets to other authorised institutions.

The long pole in Phase 1 is the audited accounts

Phase 1 under article 9 comprises items I to VIII, ending with financial statements for the last three financial years audited by an independent auditor registered with the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários. Three years of CVM-audited statements is not something a firm assembles in a quarter, and for a young provider it is frequently the item that decides whether the 30 October date is achievable at all.

Capital is also a Phase 1 gate, and it is a calculation rather than a price list. The published range runs from roughly R$10.8 million to R$37.2 million, but the arithmetic lives in the annexes to Resolução Conjunta 14/2025 read with Resolução BCB nº 517/2025: a cost parcel driven by the number of registered operational categories with an uplift for in-house technology infrastructure, and an activity parcel driven by services performed, the nature of the funds and applicable multipliers. Published law-firm worked examples land below the announced floor for some assumption sets; the annexes govern, not the examples. Whatever the number, it must be subscribed and paid up in cash, with integralisation immediately following subscription. A commitment letter or a parent guarantee is not capital.

One correction worth making before you plan the next 67 days

IN BCB 739, dated 29 May 2026 and published in the Diário Oficial da União of 1 June 2026, is widely described as having added a reasonable assurance report to the 30 October filing. That is wrong, and it matters because it changes what you have to do in the next nine weeks.

The Banco Central's own change log records exactly four changes: new wording for article 24, and the inclusion of article 5, inciso XV, article 10, inciso X, and Anexo IV. Article 9 was untouched. The assurance report therefore lands in Phase 2, under article 10 X, and in the new-entrant route under article 5 XV. Phase 2 is filed within 60 days of a favourable Phase 1 decision, extendable by up to 60 more at the Banco Central's discretion on a justified request. If you have been told you need a CVM-registered auditor's reasonable assurance report by 30 October, you have been told something the instrument does not say.

The checklist behind this article

The Brazil PSAV checklist is a readiness document for the IN BCB 704 procedure: every item cited to the article or inciso behind it, each figure marked according to whether it is normative text or reporting of it, and the genuinely unsettled points, such as how the capital annexes resolve for a given business, marked as open. USD 79, with the updated edition free as the position develops.

If you are a single-category provider with your audited statements already in hand, the checklist should carry you to 30 October without further help. If your category is genuinely arguable under article 4 of Resolução BCB nº 520, or your three years of CVM-audited accounts are incomplete, the 48-hour gap check is built for exactly that situation.

Get the note when something actually changes

The UK gateway, Kenya's VASP Act and Brazil's BCB regime. Only when a rule, date or figure moves — and primary sources are always marked separately from press reporting.

More on Brazil